On 18th July 2016, a 17 year old man had just attacked people on onboard a train in Bavaria as reported by The Local De.
Police had shot him, apparently when he was fleeing(as decribed on news portals) in their direction. The attacker did not survive.
Later that day, a minister questioned the heavy handed approach by police instead of disabling the attacker.
Reading the articles, it would seem that there were some danger towards the police at that moment. Really hard call to make.
In comparison to Amunilrasyid (see prev article) it would seem that there were lesser concern by Malaysian government or police. Bavaria police didn't mention how many bullets were shot during that fatal moment. Would they have used more than 32 bullets as in the Malaysian shooting by police on an unarmed man?
Police had shot him, apparently when he was fleeing(as decribed on news portals) in their direction. The attacker did not survive.
Later that day, a minister questioned the heavy handed approach by police instead of disabling the attacker.
Reading the articles, it would seem that there were some danger towards the police at that moment. Really hard call to make.
In comparison to Amunilrasyid (see prev article) it would seem that there were lesser concern by Malaysian government or police. Bavaria police didn't mention how many bullets were shot during that fatal moment. Would they have used more than 32 bullets as in the Malaysian shooting by police on an unarmed man?
Comments